60th birthday: Ibori Greets Alamieyeseigha From UK Jail

It’s a classic case of birds of a feather flocking together.
From a UK jail, where he is doing time for corruption, came birthday greetings from former Delta State governor, James Ibori to disgraced ex-governor of Bayelsa State, Diepreye Alamieyeseigha.
Alamieyeseigha, who was governor in Bayelsa from 29 May 1999 to 9 December 2005, and was convicted for corruption, clock 60 years today.
In a congratulory advertorial he took out in the Vanguard edition of today 16 November, Ibori showered effusive praises on Alamieyeseigha, who he described as the “Governor-General of The Ijaw Nation”.
In the birthday message signed by him, Ibori wrote: “My brother, please accept my hearty congratulations to you as you turn 60 today
“I join your numerous well-wishers to thank the good God who has kept you alive despite the vicissitudes of life – the lies and ill-treatment – that came your way just because of crass debilitating politics,” wrote Ibori.
The subdued former Delta strongman continued his adoration of Alamieyeseigha: “Yet, I know that you will take solace in the fact that the people of the Ijaw nation, whose cause you championed ever so lustily, have never forgotten what you stood for and the dangers you embraced while fighting for their higher good and fiscal federalism for Nigeria.”
Ibori added: “One day the right questions will be asked, the right answers buried deep in heaps of lies will be unhearted and Nigeria’s contemporary history, in which you starred, will be better appreciated and events put in their true perspective.”
Ibori is currently serving a concurrent 13-year jail term in a UK jail, after his conviction by a Southwark Crown Court, on 17 April this year, for money laundering offences.
The celebrant, Alamieyeseigha, also earlier bagged prison sentences, after admitting to pilfering his state’s funds. His predicament began in September 2005, when he was detained in London on charges of money laundering.
When the London Metropolitan Police searched his London home, they found about £1m in cash. A further search by the Met yielded a total of £1.8m in cash and bank accounts.
Alamieyeseigha, who was also found to own an estimated £10m worth of real estate in London, later jumped bail in the UK in December 2005, by allegedly disguising himself as a woman, though he later denied the claim.
But the ex-governor of Bayelsa was eventually jailed in Nigeria on 26 July, 2007, after he pleaded guilty to six counts of corruption, in a plea-bargaining deal.
He was sentenced to two years in prison on each count, but, because the sentences were to run concurrently, and the almost two years he earlier spent in detention while standing trial were deducted, Alamieyeseigha walked out of prison a free man a day after his conviction.
The ex-convict’s assets, including four luxury UK properties, one of them which he bought for about £1.7m cash in one day, were ordered to be forfeited to the Bayelsa State government.
Also on 28 June this year, the United States Department of Justice executed an asset forfeiture order on the sum of $401,931 in a Massachusetts brokerage fund, traceable to Alamieyeseigha.
Alams, as he is otherwise known, is now back in the scheme of things, hobnobbing with Presidency top shots, especially President Goodluck Jonathan his kinsman and former deputy while he was governor, who is believed to have rehabilitated him.

Justice Eso’s last interview: ‘Why plea bargain breeds corruption’

 October 23, 2011.
* Says woe unto corrupt judges
*’True federal system, the way forward’
Justice Kayode Eso needs no introduction. For a man whose career as a legal mind spanned about four decades with meritorious alacrity, this former Justice of Nigeria’s Supreme Court will never change.
With what some have described as a caustic tongue, especially when delivering judgments, at 86, retired Justice Eso did not disappoint Sunday Vanguard in this interview.
Sharp-minded, morally upright, Eso is your quintessential legal mind per excellence.
Recently honoured during the Hallmarks of Labour Awards, Eso says “I felt happy and fulfilled when I received the letter telling me about the award. And I thought that all my labour has not been in vain. That whatever, I have been doing in the judiciary has not been in vain. That is the way I felt”.
But on the many ills confronting the Nigerian nation, the erudite justice lamented the sorry state of the judiciary, expressed angst at the concept of PLEA BARGAIN, felt insulted by the conciliatory approach of the federal government on the Boko Haram issue and concludes by saying that if Nigerians wants to make progress as a nation, true federalism is the way forward.  He insists that the attempt to amend the Nigerian constitution would end up as a fools errand because it would not address the real issues.


 When you were still in active service in the judiciary, people applauded you for standing against corruption. But today, it seems the system has changed and what you hear today is that the judiciary is very corrupt. How do you feel when you hear this knowing your hard stance against corruption?
When I was in the judiciary, I stood up against corruption; and when I left the judiciary, I still stand against corruption.
So till now, I still stand against corruption.
I am not happy to have a corrupt bench. It is a deadly thing.
You see, the judiciary is the only hope of those who do not have money to push their ways around. Judiciary is the yardstick of the situation in the country.
Even investors look at the judiciary of a nation before taking their money to that nation. If an investor believes he cannot get justice in a country, he would not invest.
In any event, it is an honour for anybody to be appointed a judge.
If you are appointed a judge, you should not corrupt that system at all. It is woe unto anybody to corrupt the course of justice.  I do hope that we will find a way to stamp it out.

Justice Kayode Eso

As an experienced judge, what do you think we can do to get out of a corrupt judicial system?
Well, let me say at this stage that the present Chief Justice of the country has identified the issue of corruption as one of the things he must deal with.
He intends to set up a committee to look into the issue.  (He has already done that)
The committee will be meeting very soon. I believe, this week. I happen to be a member of that committee therefore, I cannot talk more about it. I won’t, I won’t say anything that would prejudice the noble attempt of the present honourable Chief Justice of the country.
First of all he wants us to advise him on how to tackle corruption on the bench and to find a way of stamping it out. I’m ready to support him on that.
What is the most interesting case that you ever tried and which one was the most difficult sir?
No case is difficult at all once it is in pursuit of justice.
That is the truth about it.
In justice, one case is as good as the other.
I cannot really think of anyone that gave me a kick after. The only one I can say gave me a kick is the case of Awolowo versus Shagari.
I stood firmly to say that you cannot break up a state to have a unit of that state and that when you have 19 states and you are looking for the two-thirds of that, you cannot really get the two_third of that state.
Please explain what you mean?
It is simple:  How do you get the two-thirds of a state? I thought it was silly for anybody to conjecture that. How it gave me a kick was that as soon as I delivered the judgment, which, of course, was in the minority, the constitution was amended.
After the amendment, how did that feel – vindicated, satisfied?
That gave satisfaction.
It is the opinion of the public that it is because the allocation of the judiciary comes from the executive that is the judiciary cannot be completely independent. What is your opinion on this?
The judiciary should not only be independent but it should also be economically be independent of the executive. It should not rely on the executive for money to flow through the system. No. it is not good enough. When you have the admixture of the judiciary with the executive, you are only putting the judiciary as an appendage of the executive, that cannot be right.
Ordinary Nigerians today see Justice Salami as a victim of the clique of people who are bent on destroying the judiciary?
On the Justice Salami case, it is in court. I’m a disciplined judicial officer, though retired. When a case is subjudice, it is not right to comment on that case. What I would say is that the matter would still have to be determined by a court, so I would rather not air my view, though I have my own view. I cannot state my view because it would still be determined by a court. So, let us wait for the determination of the court.
Penultimate week some ex-governors were arrested by the EFCC for alleged stealing of N101 billion. If just three persons could allegedly take as much from the state resources, what is then left for other ordinary Nigerian to spend?
It is still an allegation and I, as a judge, I always like to listen to the other side.
Let us see what their defence is.
The allegation is that they have looted the nation to the tune of N101 billion.
If it is correct, they should be punished. The problem with Nigeria is about the type of punishment meted out.
This notion of coming out and talking about plea bargain is something else.
They bargain with the judge, bargain with the accused person, he returns half of the money, and then they give him some hairy-fairy punishment – go and serve three months in prison and the three months, will, of course, be in the hospital.
This is an encouragement for other governors to steal when they come into office.  There is no plea bargain in our law.
The importation is wrong.
To me, it is corruption to bring plea bargain into the law of Nigeria.
Look at the issue of Igbinedion in Edo State who was alleged to have stolen billions and billions of naira. They said they had this system of plea bargain.
They asked him to plea bargain, there and then he was fined three million naira which, he picked out of his purse and paid there.
It sent a notion that it had been pre_arranged that it would not be more than three million. Now, after that they started to gloat and shed crocodile tears and said the punishment was not adequate.
Of course, the punishment can never be adequate when they import this issue of plea bargain.
But, let us say the issue of plea bargain was not introduced and he was punished as he deserved, others would learn.
Years back, I was saddled with the case of Oba Akran and Ademiluyi – Oba Akran was the Oba in Badagry, and Ademiluyi was the chairman of the biggest corporation in the country, they were alleged to have stolen 500 pounds.
They appeared before me and I gave them seven years after I had found them guilty. They wrote to the Supreme Court because there was no Court of Appeal then, their appeal was dismissed. That was justice not this way of palliating people, rubbing them with oil in the name of plea bargain.
Plea bargain is actually not our law.
And they come around and say it is done in other countries, Nigeria is not any other country. Nigeria is Nigeria not just any other country. In other countries, it may be right for them to have plea bargain. We never had plea bargain.
It is corruption for anybody who imports plea bargain into our law.
Looking at the damage and backwardness this issue of corruption has brought to this country, would you subscribe to capital punishment for those who plunder the resources of this country like it is done in Asian countries where they kill them?
No, I do not believe in capital punishment.
It is better to punish somebody and make the person live to get the pains of that punishment.
For instance, somebody who has stolen billions of naira, let them give him proper punishment and let him forfeit all his property.
Let him live in penury and let him see the difference between his stolen affluence and what actually he should be.
Is our constitution just a book given to us by the military or a book we are just living with?
The 1999 constitution lied about itself when it says we Nigerians. We Nigerians never did it but soldiers and half-baked lawyers among them sat down and wrote the constitution for us.
1999 constitution is not a constitution of this country, we should have a real constitution of this country. When you start to patch the constitution like we are patching now, we can never be there. Why are we shying away from a Constituent Assembly.
Things should not be done half way. Go all the hog.
Boko Haram has caused deaths of thousands of Nigerians. Some people are calling for dialogue with this sect. Even, government is considering amnesty for them. Do you support amnesty programme for this deadly and violent sect?
You dialogue with people you know.
Do they know who Boko Haram people are? If they know, they should arrest them. Give them amnesty for what. People are killing and you want to give them amnesty even without trying them. I do not believe in what is going on at all. These people are a menace not only to this country but to the whole world. They have given the picture of Nigeria as a failed nation that cannot even deal with security within its borders. If we have that system, we are only creating problem for ourselves and our children because once the investors believe that there is no security, they would not come with their money. And if we don’t have investors in this country, we cannot exist. Coming round and say we want to dialogue with them, dialogue with who?
Some people say let us give Boko Haram amnesty and Boko Haram say, no we don’t want amnesty. What are they saying?
In other words, they are challenging the government. Do we have a parallel government of Boko Haram?
Why don’t we arrest them? Why don’t we deal with them? Who are they? Why are they being palliated? These are the issues we should find out. Who is Boko Haram or who are Boko Haram? Who are behind them?
They went to the UN building and destroyed it, killed people. UN would not be happy with that at all and I believe they are removing their stand in Nigeria and taking it to Senegal. If that is the case, then we are a big loser in this country.
It is a failure if we don’t stamp out Boko Haram in a correct way.
The correct way is to arrest them and take them to court. It is laughable that we are giving amnesty to those who are killing us.
I don’t understand what is going on. May be it is because I’m not a politician. May be they would understand.
The political situation in the country is funny; what’s your take on that?
Things seem to be stagnant in terms of the economy.
In terms of politics, I’m not a politician, but as an observer, my candid opinion is, wait and see.
The president has just mounted the throne. Let us see, let us give chance to see how he is going to do it. The state of the nation is muddled. Let us see how he intends to pull the nation out of the muddle. That is all I can say. There is no doubt that we got it wrong, but we have a president there now. Let us give him time. Let us not judge him. I do not want to judge him before he performs. And I’m prepared to give him some time.
What is your opinion on federalism? At 86, you have seen it all, especially when compared to fiscal federalism as practised during the First Republic?
To me, we are not practising federalism in this country at all and this is what we should practise.
The west was governed by Chief Obafemi Awolowo for the federal system status. There was no question of being unitary which is what we are patching up now and calling it federal system. This country will only succeed if we practise true federalism.
The way we are being ruled, the states go cap in hand begging the Federal Government for money to develop the state and majority of those states stay poor – and in some instances, the President gets to blackmail some state governors?
It is because we are not practicing federalism at all.
The states should not go cap in hand to the Federal Government. If we have true federal system, there should be enough for all the states to spend. The issue that would be decided by the FG would be so minimal.
Some people suggested that we should go back to the regional system that we practised before?
I would advocate six provincial system.
That would be better because if you have federal system and you have 36 states, that would be very difficult. Already, we have six geo-political zones; have each zone as a federal unit. Then, we can have a true federal system and until we do that, we are just deceiving ourselves.
How do you feel about the award you are being conferred with?
I felt happy and fulfilled when I received the letter telling me about the award. And I thought that all my labour has not been in vain. That whatever, I have been doing in the judiciary has not been in vain. That is the way I felt.
Sir, people still wonder that at 86, you still look agile and sound. What is the secret?
It is God. Nothing else but God and discipline!

Jonathan and the Ribadu report??

¨It is so unfortunate that there has been so much ignorant carping and malicious tittle-tattling about the report of the Petroleum Revenue Task Force chaired by Malam Nuhu Ribadu, both failings arising from a deliberate attempt to individualise what was actually group work, a mischievous attempt to politicise one report out of three, and to smuggle into an emergent grand web of conspiracy, elements of blackmail, mischief and outright opportunism.I should like to dispel the putrefactive stench of the fart that seems to have overtaken the subject by returning all of us to certain basics that have not changed since President Goodluck Jonathan approved the setting up of committees to inquire into different aspects of the petroleum sector and particularly since the reports were presented and accepted. The facts are as follows.

The committees in question and the probe into the petroleum sector were initiated by President Jonathan to ensure transparency and accountability in the extractive industry; the goal was to transform the sector and raise levels of integrity accordingly. Every step that has been taken by this administration in this regard has been in fulfilment of this well-stated principle. This includes the decision to completely deregulate the downstream sector, which has now resulted in the exposure of oily deals in that sector, with consequences for the indicted persons.¨It also includes the launch of a concerted fight against crude oil theft and illegal payments of fuel subsidy. Zakari Mohammed of the House of Representatives talks absent-mindedly about “lack of political will” to fight corruption. He certainly doesn’t know what he is talking about.  

A legislative position should not confer a right to mendacity. He should know, if he had been reading the newspapers, that on the basis of both the report of the House of Representatives and the Aig Aig-Imoukhuede committee report on fuel subsidy payments, persons are currently being prosecuted in the law courts by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).¨The Federal Government has not done anything to stop or discourage the prosecution of indicted persons. We have made the point, again and again, that in this on-going fight against corruption, there will be no “cover ups”; and no “sacred cows,” and that President Jonathan’s only interest is the people’s interest. This same president has demonstrated the political will to deal with corruption in the country’s electoral process, to both local and global acclaim. He has no reason to make compromises in other areas of national life.

Interestingly, many of those who are now talking ignorantly about “political will” are beneficiaries of this administration’s commitment to the rule of law and fair play.¨On the specific issue of the Petroleum Revenue Task Force report, the mischief-makers should go back to the statements made by President Jonathan, and subsequently by the Petroleum Minister, Mrs Diezani Alison-Madueke, on the occasion of the presentation of the report. The president’s position that the work of the Ribadu committee and of the two other committees that presented their reports on that occasion, the Kalu Idika Kalu committee on refineries and the Dotun Sulaiman Committee on Governance is useful and enlightening has not changed. Alison-Madueke has further echoed that position more than twice. The three committees were set up as fact-finding and advisory bodies. That fact was further underscored by the president’s mature response to the altercation that the Ribadu Committee Report generated when he said that those who have issues to raise should be free to make their own independent submissions.

This shows a determination to get every possible piece of information and to accommodate all concerns. This shows a will to act. President Jonathan has not dumped any input, rather he welcomes every possible input and he has no private interest in this matter. So for anyone to say that the Ribadu committee was “calculated to fail from the beginning”, is absolutely uncharitable.   ¨Indeed, for the benefit of those playing politics and doing quick business with this matter, the truth is that President Jonathan is already taking steps to address some of the issues raised in the various reports. When President Jonathan sets up committees to investigate particular issues, he does so, because he wants to address those issues.

I had, before now, drawn attention to the fact that the president gave clear directives on the state of the refineries and that at least one meeting had been held since the presentation of the Report on Refineries, to act specifically on the recommendations made. President Jonathan has directed that he wants the refineries fixed and steps are already being taken; deadlines have been set. That didn’t make the headlines, rather, falsehood hugged the headlines, because these days it pays to fart all over the place, and attract attention.To set the records straight, here is what happened. After the presentation of the reports by the three committees, the president directed the Minister of Petroleum Resources to take up the recommendations of the Kalu committee on refineries. The committee recommended, in part, that the country’s refineries should be rehabilitated without any further delay.

On November 8, the minister and her team were at the Villa to brief the president about the state of the refineries, their current capacities, and steps that need to be taken to get them to function at optimum capacity.¨The president made it clear that the government is committed to getting the refineries to work, so that we would no longer have to import refined petroleum products, which he considers shameful, and by so doing, government would have succeeded in creating jobs and put an end to the hardship that attends importation. The meeting discussed the possibility of ensuring the turnaround maintenance (TAM) of the refineries by March 2013, and subsequently, the rehabilitation of the facilities. The meeting ended with a directive that the minister and her team should return with further presentations on the technical details of the agreed plan of action.

This is one clear example of prompt action and demonstration of commitment.  ¨President Jonathan has no reason to embarrass anyone who served on any of the three committees. While receiving the reports, these were his words: “…we have seen that the people that have been selected in these committees are people that are known by Nigerians; people that are credible; most especially people that are patriotic and I believe that they put all that into consideration for the interest of the country not for the interest of any individual.

You have submitted your reports today. We have to thank you very sincerely and government will surely make use of these reports… because we feel that the oil industry as it is, need to be reformed.” I urge you to note the emphasis on all the reports without exception!¨Thereafter, President Jonathan commented on the work of the individual committees. On Sulaiman committee, he said: “…we feel that our governance and control, (in the oil and gas sector) we need to look at it. And of course quite a number of issues raised by the presenters link up with even the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) issues and I believe it will even help the National Assembly robustly in terms of looking at some aspects of the PIB. So we thank you very sincerely for that.”On the Kalu committee he said: “In the case of the refineries, I really have to thank you because I was listening, trying to see the kind of recommendations you will bring up…Maybe some of you don’t know but those of us who are in politics, they used to ‘yab’ us some years back that in Nigeria we import what we have and export what we don’t have. They say we import what we have because we have crude oil for God’s sake.

Ordinarily if it is a country where we placed our focus right, we should be having filling stations all over Africa and all over the world …It is disgraceful that we are importing petroleum products. If in the next 10 years this country still imports petroleum products then all of us who have the opportunity to be here, in fact when we die they should write something and put behind us that we did not rule this country well, because we must stop the importation of petroleum products.”  Hence, the president held the aforementioned follow-up meeting on refineries.  Now, on the Ribadu report, President Jonathan said, inter alia: “…

Probably not everybody agreed on some of the conclusions but I don’t think we need to bother…what we would say is that any member who has one or two observations should please write it either directly to me through the Chief of Staff or through the Minister of Petroleum Resources…But the issues of finance, if it borders on corrupt practice or outright stealing, definitely it will go to the EFCC for investigation…If there are errors of calculation or misinformation from the relevant agencies of government that are supposed to give the correct figures, that will be filtered out. It will not be used against anybody, because the interest of government to set up these committees is to help us do what is right. It is not to help us do what is wrong. And that is why we have to be careful and do what is right. So I plead with you.  But let me assure you that government has no interest in hiding anything…”Let me cut this short, at this point, by saying that President Jonathan has no reason whatsoever, personal or political (since at least one character has said that the furore over the Ribadu report has something  to do with 2015!) to protect wrong-doers in the land.

He took on this assignment to make Nigeria better and that is what he is doing everyday: working hard at the Nigerian project and taking every step to transform it for good.  The Nigerian people are enjoined to stand on the side of truth and to reject the mischief of all hunters of fortune whose interest is their own ambitions, for in this Ribadu Committee Report matter, personal ambitions are beginning to becloud the facts. President Jonathan will continue to provide leadership. Nobody should drag him into the cheap arena of opportunistic demagoguery
Reuben Abati

Religion and the Nigerian Condition

While the pundits are still analysing the factors that shaped the outcome of last week presidential election in the United States (comedian Chris Rock said you don’t beat a Kenyan in a race!), the most formidable opposition to President Barack Obama’s re-election came from the American Christian Evangelicals. The reasons were not difficult to fathom: Many of them could not reconcile themselves to his healthcare reform policy which covered contraception; his seeming ambivalence towards the State of Israel (which he is yet to visit) and his open endorsement of same-sex marriage. But at the end, Obama still won in religion-biased battleground states like the Catholic-dominated Ohio, evangelical-heavy Iowa and Virginia as well as in Florida.

With the election over last Wednesday morning, I left Washington to spend a few days in Boston and I decided to visit the Harvard Weatherhead Centre for International Affairs where I spent the 2010/2011 session as a Fellow. Evidently delighted to have me around, the Centre’s director invited by me to join the current Fellows at their Friday seminar last week. The topic of discussion was “The Challenges of Religious Pluralism in the United States” with Ms Diana L. Eck, one of Harvard’s most respected scholars and a Professor of Law and Psychiatry in Society, as speaker.

Quite naturally, Prof Eck spent considerable time in her presentation to speak on the role religion played in the election but the eye opener for me was the discussion that followed, as Fellows, one after another, expressed what they described as a culture shock about their American experience. They found it difficult to understand why in this day and age, many Americans would still consider God and religion important in their affairs. Drawn mostly from Europe, Asia and Latin America, many of the Fellows spoke about their countries and the fact that the idea of God and religion had for a long time faded away. One Fellow, a lady who said going to Church was no longer fashionable in her country, added: “Out of curiousity, I attended a church here last week and I actually enjoyed it. I found it very entertaining.” The discussion went along that line until Prof Eck asked Lt. General Abdulrahman Dambazau (immediate past Chief of Army Staff and the only African in the class), “is religion important in Nigeria?”.

Without hesitation, General Dambazau answered in the affirmative before he added: “I want Segun to share the Christian perspective while I will speak for Islam.” As we explained how religion has become a potent weapon in our country, I am sure it was also not lost on the Fellows that we are still generally a poor people despite our religiousity.

In our country today, before every government meeting, prayers are said by both Islamic and Christian adherents to commit deliberations into the hands of God, even when the outcome might have already been predetermined by the hands of men! But this is not restricted to government. In some of the banks that CBN had to take over as a result of the greed of their CEOs, there were daily corporate supplications to God before commencement of business. It didn’t matter that some smart people were already manipulating events outside of God. At motor parks, there are all manners of charlatans masquerading as pastors and Imams and at markets, there are also prayer warriors who have no qualms cheating customers after their profession of holiness.

The result of the foregoing is that a resource-endowed country where majority of the citizens live below poverty line now holds the dubious distinction of having the highest concentration of private jets in Africa. Owned largely by bank CEOs, Christian clerics, fuel subsidy merchants, political office holders and their cronies, these expensive toys--each of which costs millions of Dollar—have grown in number to about 200 today, up from about 50 in 2008. In a brilliant piece posted on the internet last week, Obinna Akukwe wrote on the contradiction of religion in our country: “...God hears the personal prayers of Nigerians for a better personal life but when it comes to extending such to national life, the same God shuts the door. Something is wrong somewhere.”

Yes something definitely is wrong. Today, many otherwise respectable Christians in government and business would do any deal, compromise any principles and break any law, all in the bid to make money at the end of which he/she could deploy some of the ill-gotten wealth to the Church. Their Muslim counterparts are no better. Many would also steal and spend part of the proceeds either to erect Mosques or to send some poor folks to Mecca, in a fashion almost akin to an armed robber sending relief materials to his victims in a perverted sense of benevolence.

Our nation is now defined by majority of the Seven Social Sins, identified by Mahatma Gandhi which are: politics without principles; wealth without work; pleasure without conscience; knowledge without character; commerce without morality; science without humanity, and worship without sacrifice. It is therefore no surprise that the United Nation’s report released on Tuesday listed Nigeria as leading the world with 10.5 million children not attending school. Six per cent of the young men (15- 29 years) who left school are illiterate and 26 per cent semi-illiterate, according to the study by UNESCO’s Education for All (EFA) Global Monitoring Report.

But since we have elevated religion to a national ideology, the question we should ask is: why is it that the most religious countries on earth are also the poorest while the least religious countries are wealthier? Congo, Burundi, Zimbabwe, Somalia, Yemen, Nigeria etc are among the most religious countries yet majority of their people are poor whereas prosperous countries like Sweden, Japan, Denmark, Hong Kong, etc are among the least religious. A close examination of countries where you have the most brutal form of dictatorship/incompetent government and corruption also reveals that they are among the religious countries. For instance, a recent 44-nation survey of the Pew Global Attitudes Project which shows global regional divides over the personal importance of religion concluded that “in Africa, no fewer than eight-in-ten in any country see religion as very important personally.” In actual fact, 96 percent of Nigerians are religious!

I must point out here that I am not in any way suggesting that religion is not important or that God should have no place in our national life. No, I cannot suggest that because I firmly believe that God presides over the affairs of men and indeed, the lesson from the United States is that we can hold on to our individual faith in God and personal commitment to our religion yet still prosper as a nation. For instance, a recent survey titled, “Beliefs About God Across Time And Countries,” conducted by the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago, ranked United States fifth among selected religious countries. The research was able to establish that on religion “Americans’ views are closer to people in developing nations than to the publics of developed nations.”

What that establishes is that it is not wrong, indeed it is right, for every Nigerian to hold on to his/her faith. But religion should never be a weapon of manipulation (by politicians) or exploitation (by Pastors, Imams and political cum business elite). There should at all times be a clear separation between religion and the state while adherents must live what they profess. As things stand today, there seems to be but a thin line between religion, politics and business in our country and rather unfortunately, our people are worse off for it.

China reduces price of petrol products, as Nigeria prices constantly soar - Premium Times Nigeria

 China says it is acting based on international oil markets
While the Federal Government in Nigeria is making efforts to completely deregulate the downstream sector of the petroleum industry that will see an increase in pump price of petrol from the current (official) N97 to at least N141 per litre, the Chinese Government has for the fourth time this year reduced the price of petrol for its motorists.
Starting from Friday, Chinese motorists will pay a reduced price for petrol and diesel. In China, price for petrol per litre has been reduced by 0.22 yuan (N5.5) while the price per litre of diesel has been reduced by 0.26 yuan (N6.6).
The price reduction is the fourth in 2012.
The regulatory National Development and Reform Commission, NDRC, said on Thursday in a statement that the cuts followed a drop in the cost of crude oil in the international market which was affected by the presidential election in the United States and the slow recovery of the global economy.
“International oil prices have tumbled. WTI and Brent oil futures dropped to $85 a barrel and $105 a barrel, respectively, as of the start of November,” the NDRC said in a statement on its website.
The cut which takes effect on Friday represents a decrease of 3.2% for petrol and 3.4% for diesel on the ceiling benchmarks of CNY9, 640/tonne and CNY8, 820/tonne respectively.
As at Wednesday, the value of China’s crude basket had fallen by 4.36% since September 7.
Under the country’s oil-product pricing system, which started in 2008, domestic fuel prices may be adjusted when the moving average of the basket of international crudes change more than 4% over the 22-working-day period.
China imports nearly half of its oil requirements and the NDRC determines the price of the products based on international market forces.
The NDRC last adjusted petrol and diesel prices on September 11 this year, adding CNY550/ tonne and CNY540/tonne respectively, to reflect rising international oil prices.
China’s system is a bit different from Nigeria’s. Though prices are adjusted based on international price of crude, the government still determines how much petrol and diesel are sold to the citizens to avoid exploitation by fuel stations.
The Nigerian Government has said it needs to completely deregulate petrol to make it readily available. Diesel is already completely deregulated and marketers choose how much they want to sell to motorists.